Agent teamsBuilt for your leadership, not your mailroom
Always on24/7, kept alive by us
4–6 weeksFrom first call to live agents
Scroll
Why most AI fails
Everyone bought the tools. Almost no one changed the work.
The technology stopped being the constraint two years ago. Deployment is.
Four patterns account for nearly every stalled initiative we are brought in
to repair.
01
AI bolted onto a process designed for humans doing it by hand. The bottleneck moves one step downstream.
02
Tools with no memory. Every request starts from zero. Nothing compounds, so nothing gets better.
03
Pilots built to demo, not to run. They survive the boardroom and die the first week of real volume.
04
The spend went to the bottom of the org chart. Fifty people saved four minutes each. The people whose decisions actually move the company got nothing.
Most firms hand AI to the people with the least room to use it. We build it for the people whose output sets the ceiling — and make them unstoppable.
Proof: Selected engagements
A few of the operators who stopped being the ceiling.
$0M$1.2M
in new contracts, won by work the agents did on their own.
A commercial ceilings contractor whose VP of Operations was the bottleneck on every bid.
The company was not short on demand. It was short on its VP of Operations. Every bid
needed her to assemble it, price it, and chase it, and the ones she could not
reach in time were simply not bid. Estimating capacity was one person’s
calendar, and that calendar was full.
Five months in, a team of agents assembles bids, submits them, and runs the
outreach behind them. That work alone has brought in more than $1.2 million in
contracts the company would not otherwise have quoted. The agents also built
the CRM they now run on, stood up and maintain the shared infrastructure they
work across, and have shipped internal web apps the company had been told were
not worth building. The company did not add headcount to do any of it.
Nobody was laid off. The two administrators absorbing this work now run client-facing coordination.
$1.2M+
New contracts secured through agent-run bid assembly, submission, and outreach
~$400k
Annualized value of executive work returned to the VP of Operations
1
Custom CRM, designed and built by the agent team
31 hrs
Administrative hours returned every week
What the agents built
Bid engine — Assembles, prices, and submits bids, then runs the follow-up sequence.
The CRM — Built from scratch by the agents, wired into the rest of the team.
Shared infrastructure — Several agents operating one environment together, maintaining it themselves.
On-demand web apps — Internal tools built in days, at a cost that made them worth having.
“Honestly we didn’t build this to cut headcount. That wasn’t the plan at all. But about four months in I realized we hadn’t posted a single job listing, and the work was getting done faster than before. The two gals we had in admin, they moved over to client-side stuff and honestly they’re better at it.”
VP of Operations · Commercial ceilings contractor
Figures measured against the five months preceding deployment. Client identity
withheld under a standing confidentiality agreement. References available to
qualified prospects.
5 days
from first conversation to a pricing app his crews were quoting from.
A ~$24M ARR residential solar company, and an owner who had stopped waiting on his own IT.
The owner’s constraint was turnaround. Roof measurement and pricing sat
between a lead and a quote, and both moved at the speed of whoever was free.
Leads from Nextdoor and Google landed in places nobody was watching. A customer
list five years deep had never been mailed twice.
His partner agent went in first, ahead of any wider rollout. In week one it
built and shipped a roof-measuring and pricing app for bidding and material
ordering, put lead capture from Nextdoor and Google into one queue, and ran a
reactivation campaign across current and former customers. In week two the
office server dropped. He had been stuck for two hours and was booking the usual
two-day IT callout. The agent had him back in five minutes.
An owner who got his server back in five minutes instead of two days.
5 days
From first conversation to a live roof-measuring and pricing app
2 hrs → 5 min
Server outage resolved by the agent, against a two-day IT callout
2
Lead sources captured into one queue: Nextdoor and Google
5 yrs
Of former customers reached in the first reactivation campaign
Week one
Pricing app — Measures the roof, prices the job, orders the material.
Lead capture — Nextdoor and Google into one queue the owner can see.
Reactivation — Current and former customers, contacted from a list that had gone cold.
Always on — The agent does not schedule a callout. It fixes it and tells you it is fixed.
“So I’m sitting there, two hours in, ready to call my IT guy and wait two days like last time. And then I figured, well, let me just ask Turner. I literally hadn’t finished typing the message and he had me reconnected. Five minutes maybe. I just sat there for a second like, what am I even paying my IT guy for.”
Owner · Residential solar, ~$24M ARR
Deployment figures are actual. Pipeline and hour figures are the client’s own
estimates. Client identity withheld. References available to qualified prospects.
9 days → 2
to price and return a complex freight quote.
A regional 3PL whose two owners were the only people who could price a complicated lane.
Simple quotes went out same day. Anything with multiple stops, a temperature
requirement, or an unfamiliar lane went to one of the two owners, and it sat in
their queue behind everything else running the company. Quotes that took nine
days were often quotes that arrived after the decision.
A partner agent was built for the pricing side of the business, working from
four years of completed loads, live carrier rates, and the owners’ own
margin rules. It drafts the quote and shows its reasoning; an owner approves or
corrects it, and the correction sticks. Complex quotes now return in two days.
The owners still price the exceptions. They no longer price the queue.
They kept the judgment. They gave away the queue.
9 days → 2
Turnaround on complex freight quotes
+18%
Quote volume, on the same team
~11 hrs
Owner time returned each week
4 yrs
Of completed loads the agent prices against
Pricing agent — Drafts the quote from historical loads, live carrier rates, and the owners’ margin rules.
Reasoning shown — Every quote arrives with the logic attached, so a correction is a conversation.
Corrections stick — What the owners fix once, the agent carries forward.
Exceptions escalate — Unfamiliar lanes and thin-margin bids still route to a human.
“We didn’t need it to be smarter than us on pricing, that was never really the point. The point was we had a stack of quotes sitting on my desk that I couldn’t get to fast enough, and by the time I did half of them had already gone to somebody else. Now they go out the same day and I just review the ones where I actually need to think.”
Managing partner · Regional external logistics
Figures measured against the four months preceding deployment. Client identity
withheld under a standing confidentiality agreement. References available to
qualified prospects.
$3.2M
in settlements secured at agent-supported valuations.
A boutique plaintiff litigation firm, eighteen people, where the leadership team was the bottleneck on every case worth taking.
The firm’s constraint was not case volume. It was the leadership team. Every
intake needed a partner’s read on viability. Every settlement demanded their judgment on
what the case was worth. Discovery — tens of thousands of pages per matter
— sat in queues behind his calendar, and the paralegals who could move it
were waiting on his calls. Cases he could not reach in time did not get taken.
Settlements he could not price from memory settled low.
Five months in, four agents run the work that used to pile on his desk. One
reviews, tags, and privilege-flags discovery productions overnight —
associates arrive to a coded, screened file instead of a raw dump. Another prices
new matters against the firm’s own two hundred-plus resolved cases and
venue-specific jury verdict data, giving the partner a data-backed range before
the first call. A third assembles medical records from every provider into a
single chronological summary, with key records flagged, the morning after they
arrive. A fourth tracks every statute of limitations, response deadline, and
court date across forty-seven active cases. The partners still make the calls.
They just make them faster, and they make them with the numbers in front of them.
The partners still make the calls. The agents make sure they have the numbers before they do.
$3.2M
In settlements secured at agent-supported valuations
9 days → 1
Discovery document review turnaround on complex matters
200+
Resolved cases the agent prices new matters against
~180 hrs
Paralegal time returned every month
Discovery engine — Reviews, tags, and privilege-flags document productions overnight. Associates arrive to a sorted, coded, privilege-screened file.
Settlement intelligence — Prices new matters against the firm’s 200+ resolved cases and venue-specific jury verdict data. The partner still decides. The number is no longer a guess.
Medical chronology — Assembles every provider’s records into a single chronological summary, with key records flagged. What took three weeks now exists the morning after records arrive.
Deadline command — Every statute of limitations, response deadline, and court date across the active caseload, tracked and escalated. Zero misses in five months.
“Look, I’ve been doing this 22 years and every firm I’ve ever been at has the same problem, right, you get a big production and it just sits there because nobody has time to go through it. So you come in on a Saturday with your paralegals and you grind through ten thousand pages and you hate your life. Now I come in Monday and it’s done. Coded, tagged, the privilege calls are already flagged for me to review. I still check the work, don’t get me wrong, but I’m checking it, not doing it. That’s a different job.”
Figures measured against the five months preceding deployment. Client identity
withheld under a standing confidentiality agreement. References available to
qualified prospects.
The difference
There are two ways to buy AI. One of them moves the company.
Both are legitimate. Only one changes what the business is capable of, and almost nobody sells it.
Everyone else
Automation, sprayed everywhere.
Dozens of small bots bolted across your stack. Each one shaves minutes off a task somebody was already doing. Fifty people get slightly faster. The org chart is unchanged, and so is the ceiling.
Many small gains, none of them compounding.
Pinnoq
Agent teams, at the top.
Agent teams built for your leadership — the CEO, the COO, the VPs whose decisions set the pace for everyone downstream. They shave time, they automate the tedium, they build the tools nobody got around to building, and they do the work your top people never had time to reach. Your leadership stops being the ceiling and starts being the thing that pushes the whole business forward. What your leadership can now do, the company can now do.
Your leadership, unstoppable. Everything below, moved.
Everyone else automates tasks. We amplify the people the whole company is waiting on.
The math is not close. A bot that saves a coordinator twenty minutes saves twenty
minutes. Agent teams that let your leadership bid every job, price every case,
and reach every opportunity are the difference between what the company did
and what it could have done. In the engagement above that
difference was $1.2 million in five months, and none of it came from anyone
working faster.
MemoryThey know your accounts, your people, and what you decided last quarter.
IdentityDefined roles, with defined boundaries. They are leadership’s agents, not everybody’s tools.
JudgmentThey know what to handle and what belongs in front of you.
We build the sprayed-everywhere kind too, when a client asks and it makes sense. It is
not what we lead with, because it is not what moves the number.
How it works: What an engagement covers
Build the agent team. Keep it alive. Teach your people to wield it.
Three things, one retainer. We are not a staffing firm and not a software vendor.
What we are accountable for is that the agents are running, getting better every month,
and that your people know how to get the most out of them. We build partner agents for
your leadership team, keep them alive and improving, and train every employee who works
alongside them. Your top people stop being the ceiling and start pushing the business forward.
Build
We start with your leadership team and the work only they can do. Each agent is designed
around a specific role: what it owns, what it decides, what it escalates, what it is
never allowed to touch. They go live in weeks, not quarters, tested
against real volume before anyone depends on it. Built on open frameworks your
team can read, maintain, and keep.
Partner agents designed around each leader and their work
Memory, identity, and defined judgment boundaries from day one
Multi-model architecture, not locked to one lab
Security, access governance, and data sovereignty built in, not bolted on
Keep alive and improve
Then it is our job to keep it running and make it better. Models improve every
few months, and we move your agent onto what is better as it arrives. Harnesses
get updated. Servers get patched and monitored. You get an uptime guarantee and
a direct line to the people who built the thing. This is the part most vendors do
not sell, and it is the part that makes the agent worth more in month twelve than
it was in month one, at the same price.
Model updates as the field advances, at no change in price
Harness and framework updates, tested before they touch production
Server maintenance, monitoring, and an uptime guarantee
Direct line to the people who built your system
New capability added as the work reveals it
Train and educate
Every person who works with an agent gets brought up to speed by us. Not a slide
deck. Working sessions on how to brief an agent, what to hand it, what to check,
and where the line is. Your team stops being users of a tool and starts being
operators of a capability. That is what makes the layer survive turnover, and what
makes the second agent cheaper than the first.
Working sessions for every employee who touches an agent
Briefing, review, and escalation practice on your real work
Internal documentation your team owns and updates
Your people build their own skills and processes on the layer
Custom integrations into your existing systems are available on request and quoted
separately. They are not part of the standard retainer, and we will tell you plainly
when you do not need them.
You own everything.
Your data belongs to you. No model lab owns your agents, your context, or the memory they accumulate. The frameworks are open. Your employees know how to run them. You are never locked into a vendor, a platform, or a single model provider. If you ever take it in-house, you keep it all.
Pricing: Engagement
From $10,000per month
A senior operator costs $200,000 and comes with a calendar. A partner agent team costs
$120,000 a year, works the whole week, and gets better every month at the same price.
The engagement above won $1.2 million in contracts in five months. One contract covers
the year.
One monthly retainer: the build, the keep-alive, and the training.
No implementation feeNo per-seat pricingNo charge for the hours it takes us to get it right
Included
Everything — build, keep-alive, training, and the improvements
Model and harness updates at no price change as the field advances
Server maintenance, monitoring, and uptime guarantee
Open frameworks — infrastructure you own and can keep
Direct access to the people who built your system
Custom integrations into existing systems quoted separately
Not included
Inference costs (API tokens)Billed at provider rates, passed through at cost.
VPS infrastructureYour servers, your accounts. We maintain and monitor them.
Thirty-day notice. No lock-in. If it isn't earning its retainer, you'll know
— and you keep everything we built.
First conversation to a live partner agent in four to six weeks.
Week 1
Diagnose
We find the people the company is waiting on, and the work they never reach. Honest read on where agents help and where they don't.
Week 2
Design
The role, the boundaries, the escalation path, the honest cost. You see the plan before we build.
Weeks 3–5
Build
Agents go live and get tested against real volume. The people around them are trained while they're being built, not after.
Ongoing
Keep alive and improve
Monitored, patched, and moved onto better models as they ship. Your team keeps getting better at working with it. So does it.
Let's begin
Tell us what you'd do with another you.
Describe your operation and the work only your leadership can do — the part that never
gets reached. We'll tell you honestly whether agent teams change that, and honestly
if it doesn't.